Skip to Content
Main content

EXCELLENCE GIRLS CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

321
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

37

9%

LEVEL 2

76

18%

LEVEL 3

150

35%

LEVEL 4

171

39%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

35

9%

LEVEL 2

92

24%

LEVEL 3

128

33%

LEVEL 4

132

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

10

83%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

8

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

271
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

57

16%

LEVEL 3

131

36%

LEVEL 4

140

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

210
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

75

24%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

107

34%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

12

28%

LEVEL 4

15

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

16

37%

LEVEL 4

13

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

301
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

65

17%

LEVEL 3

134

35%

LEVEL 4

167

43%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

72

21%

LEVEL 3

119

35%

LEVEL 4

128

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

15

33%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

16

35%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

16

33%

LEVEL 2

20

41%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

319
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

36

8%

LEVEL 2

72

17%

LEVEL 3

149

35%

LEVEL 4

170

40%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

257
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

87

23%

LEVEL 3

127

34%

LEVEL 4

130

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

6

8%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

24

34%

LEVEL 4

32

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

26

37%

LEVEL 4

30

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

265
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

67

18%

LEVEL 3

126

35%

LEVEL 4

139

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

204
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

80

25%

LEVEL 3

102

32%

LEVEL 4

102

32%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

298
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

67

17%

LEVEL 3

135

34%

LEVEL 4

163

41%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

15

41%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.