Skip to Content
Main content

JOHN W LAVELLE PREP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

167

38%

LEVEL 2

169

39%

LEVEL 3

67

15%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

198

42%

LEVEL 2

173

37%

LEVEL 3

73

16%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

79

37%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

94

42%

LEVEL 2

86

38%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

88

39%

LEVEL 2

87

39%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

104

42%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

16

47%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

13

39%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

51
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

82

40%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

53
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

86

40%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

72

40%

LEVEL 2

74

41%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

95

46%

LEVEL 2

78

38%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

69

25%

LEVEL 2

114

42%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

90

31%

LEVEL 2

117

40%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

98

59%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

108

61%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

102
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

158

37%

LEVEL 2

166

39%

LEVEL 3

67

16%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

98
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

192

42%

LEVEL 2

169

37%

LEVEL 3

72

16%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

27

33%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

17

21%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

40

38%

LEVEL 2

37

35%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

140

39%

LEVEL 2

140

39%

LEVEL 3

50

14%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

158

43%

LEVEL 2

136

37%

LEVEL 3

55

15%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

101
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

156

37%

LEVEL 2

162

39%

LEVEL 3

67

16%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.