Skip to Content
Main content

SOUNDVIEW ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

145

41%

LEVEL 2

132

37%

LEVEL 3

55

16%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

132

37%

LEVEL 2

126

35%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

71

39%

LEVEL 2

75

42%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

59

32%

LEVEL 2

75

41%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

74

43%

LEVEL 2

57

33%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

73

42%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

63

50%

LEVEL 2

41

33%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

45

41%

LEVEL 2

36

32%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

80

38%

LEVEL 2

86

40%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

83

36%

LEVEL 2

86

38%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

86

32%

LEVEL 2

113

42%

LEVEL 3

47

18%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

87

32%

LEVEL 2

101

37%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

59

69%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

45

56%

LEVEL 2

25

31%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

73
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

127

40%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

94
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

108

33%

LEVEL 2

123

38%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

18

56%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

24

80%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

22

30%

LEVEL 2

33

45%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

20

31%

LEVEL 2

25

38%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

123

44%

LEVEL 2

99

35%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

112

39%

LEVEL 2

101

35%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

62
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

128

41%

LEVEL 2

119

39%

LEVEL 3

47

15%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

86
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

113

36%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

17

39%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

19

45%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.