VILLAGE ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

211

58%

LEVEL 2

120

33%

LEVEL 3

25

7%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

158

42%

LEVEL 2

116

31%

LEVEL 3

75

20%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

92

54%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

69

40%

LEVEL 2

53

31%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

119

62%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

89

44%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

111

55%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

15

7%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

69
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

74

35%

LEVEL 2

68

32%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

94

65%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

80

53%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

17

11%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

29
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

148

51%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

25

9%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

107

37%

LEVEL 2

96

33%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

63

86%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

51

61%

LEVEL 2

20

24%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

30
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

160

54%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

25

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

101
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

103

33%

LEVEL 2

104

34%

LEVEL 3

74

24%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

51

81%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

55

81%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

31

53%

LEVEL 2

26

44%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

32

45%

LEVEL 2

17

24%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

180

59%

LEVEL 2

94

31%

LEVEL 3

24

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

126

41%

LEVEL 2

99

32%

LEVEL 3

61

20%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

27
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

194

58%

LEVEL 2

113

34%

LEVEL 3

22

7%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

95
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

142

41%

LEVEL 2

106

31%

LEVEL 3

68

20%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

17

61%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

16

48%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.