Skip to Content
Main content

NUASIN NEXT GENERATION CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

87

29%

LEVEL 2

94

31%

LEVEL 3

78

26%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

93

29%

LEVEL 2

109

34%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

51

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

42

26%

LEVEL 2

54

34%

LEVEL 3

43

27%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

50

30%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

45

32%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

35

25%

LEVEL 4

20

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

43

28%

LEVEL 2

59

39%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

49
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

34

27%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

44
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

30

26%

LEVEL 2

42

36%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

52

31%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

62

32%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

34

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

61

23%

LEVEL 2

85

33%

LEVEL 3

75

29%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

75

26%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

49

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

26

63%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

18

51%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

115
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

73

27%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

73

27%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

112
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

70

25%

LEVEL 2

96

35%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

14

52%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

23

53%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

77

28%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

83

28%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

61

21%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

116
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

84

29%

LEVEL 2

90

31%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.