DEMOCRACY PREP HARLEM CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

108

25%

LEVEL 2

128

30%

LEVEL 3

118

27%

LEVEL 4

78

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

115

23%

LEVEL 2

170

34%

LEVEL 3

130

26%

LEVEL 4

80

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

55

24%

LEVEL 2

73

32%

LEVEL 3

62

27%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

46

19%

LEVEL 2

94

39%

LEVEL 3

71

29%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

53

26%

LEVEL 2

55

27%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

42

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

69

27%

LEVEL 2

76

30%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

47

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

120
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

79

27%

LEVEL 2

89

31%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

137
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

80

24%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

88

26%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

27

20%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

40

30%

LEVEL 4

31

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

72
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

42

28%

LEVEL 4

30

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

69

20%

LEVEL 2

111

31%

LEVEL 3

103

29%

LEVEL 4

70

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

63

16%

LEVEL 2

141

36%

LEVEL 3

110

28%

LEVEL 4

73

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

39

49%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

52

48%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

189
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

90

23%

LEVEL 2

117

30%

LEVEL 3

112

28%

LEVEL 4

77

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

205
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

92

20%

LEVEL 2

158

35%

LEVEL 3

126

28%

LEVEL 4

79

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

18

50%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

23

58%

LEVEL 2

12

30%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

13

23%

LEVEL 2

20

35%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

12

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

10

19%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

9

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

95

25%

LEVEL 2

108

29%

LEVEL 3

106

28%

LEVEL 4

66

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

188
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

105

24%

LEVEL 2

150

34%

LEVEL 3

117

26%

LEVEL 4

71

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

172
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

97

26%

LEVEL 2

111

29%

LEVEL 3

104

27%

LEVEL 4

68

18%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

24
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

11

21%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.