Skip to Content
Main content

EAST SIDE ELEMENTARY-PS 267 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

13

8%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

92

59%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

11

6%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

124

73%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

22

27%

LEVEL 4

54

65%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

20

21%

LEVEL 4

72

76%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

38

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

52

68%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

12

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

13

72%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

7

6%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

69

59%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

10

8%

LEVEL 3

26

20%

LEVEL 4

95

72%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

9

60%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

6

5%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

83

69%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

114

78%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

11

32%

LEVEL 4

9

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

10

42%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

153
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

10

6%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

121

73%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

8

6%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

89

64%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

9

6%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

107

73%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

17

68%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.