AMANI PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

157

53%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

160

48%

LEVEL 2

96

29%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

58

48%

LEVEL 2

46

38%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

71

47%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

99

57%

LEVEL 2

41

24%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

89

50%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

43
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

137

53%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

70
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

142

49%

LEVEL 2

79

27%

LEVEL 3

52

18%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

14

54%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

16

52%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

141

51%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

145

47%

LEVEL 2

88

29%

LEVEL 3

54

18%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

16

89%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

15

65%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

75
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

155

48%

LEVEL 2

94

29%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

34

49%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

44

49%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

17

19%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

123

55%

LEVEL 2

67

30%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

116

48%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

49
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

151

53%

LEVEL 2

84

30%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

74
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

152

48%

LEVEL 2

93

29%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.