EXPLORE EXCEL CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

101

29%

LEVEL 2

79

23%

LEVEL 3

93

27%

LEVEL 4

75

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

91

26%

LEVEL 2

74

21%

LEVEL 3

93

27%

LEVEL 4

92

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

52

30%

LEVEL 2

35

20%

LEVEL 3

47

27%

LEVEL 4

42

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

39

24%

LEVEL 2

32

19%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

50

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

49

28%

LEVEL 2

44

26%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

33

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

52

28%

LEVEL 2

42

23%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

42

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

147
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

96

30%

LEVEL 2

72

23%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

67

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

167
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

89

27%

LEVEL 2

69

21%

LEVEL 3

86

26%

LEVEL 4

81

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

6

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

54

20%

LEVEL 2

62

23%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

67

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

43

16%

LEVEL 2

55

21%

LEVEL 3

80

30%

LEVEL 4

87

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

47

58%

LEVEL 2

17

21%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

48

56%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

164
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

93

28%

LEVEL 2

71

22%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

74

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

180
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

87

26%

LEVEL 2

67

20%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

90

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

18

23%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

26

33%

LEVEL 4

18

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

21

25%

LEVEL 2

11

13%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

30

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

83

31%

LEVEL 2

62

23%

LEVEL 3

67

25%

LEVEL 4

57

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

70

26%

LEVEL 2

63

24%

LEVEL 3

72

27%

LEVEL 4

62

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

162
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

98

29%

LEVEL 2

74

22%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

72

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.