Skip to Content
Main content

ROSCOE CONKLING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

131

41%

LEVEL 2

85

27%

LEVEL 3

71

22%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

124

41%

LEVEL 2

72

24%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

67

42%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

59

38%

LEVEL 2

46

29%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

64

41%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

65

44%

LEVEL 2

26

18%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

26

35%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

20

27%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

28

35%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

13

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

38
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

32

33%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

25

26%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

23

26%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

20

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

32

52%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

43

66%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

35

55%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

23

43%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

12

22%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

97

36%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

84

33%

LEVEL 2

69

27%

LEVEL 3

63

24%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

34

77%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

40

87%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

86
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

80

35%

LEVEL 2

64

28%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

94
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

81

35%

LEVEL 2

59

25%

LEVEL 3

56

24%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

51

59%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

43

61%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

9

35%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

10

37%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

7

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

122

42%

LEVEL 2

78

27%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

114

41%

LEVEL 2

69

25%

LEVEL 3

59

21%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.