NEW HEIGHTS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

123

57%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

133

55%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

30

12%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

56

50%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

53

50%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

67

64%

LEVEL 2

28

27%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

80

59%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

108

59%

LEVEL 2

49

27%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

107

53%

LEVEL 2

62

31%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

12

55%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

15

60%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

83

50%

LEVEL 2

51

31%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

40
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

80

44%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

40

78%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

53

88%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

115

56%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

39
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

121

53%

LEVEL 2

67

30%

LEVEL 3

28

12%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

12

75%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

26

47%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

112

59%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

107

57%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

97

57%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

34
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

106

53%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

26

57%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

27

63%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.