Skip to Content
Main content

EVERGREEN MS-URBAN EXPLORATION GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

119

53%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

31

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

166

50%

LEVEL 2

100

30%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

63

53%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

80

48%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

56

53%

LEVEL 2

34

32%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

86

52%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

30

65%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

32

51%

LEVEL 2

22

35%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

85

49%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

130

50%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

88

47%

LEVEL 2

66

35%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

126

45%

LEVEL 2

92

33%

LEVEL 3

54

19%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

31

82%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

40

77%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

34
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

88

47%

LEVEL 2

65

35%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

65
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

112

42%

LEVEL 2

92

34%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

31

82%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

54

86%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

109

52%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

155

50%

LEVEL 2

95

30%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

29
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

105

55%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

59
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

138

50%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

14

42%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

28

51%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.