Skip to Content
Main content

SUCCESS ACADEMY CS-BRONX 3 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

2%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

199

85%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

333
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

14

4%

LEVEL 3

76

22%

LEVEL 4

257

73%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

87

86%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

156
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

5%

LEVEL 3

28

17%

LEVEL 4

128

78%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

112

85%

MALE

PROFICIENT

177
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

6

3%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

129

70%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

115
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

99

84%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

182
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

4%

LEVEL 3

41

21%

LEVEL 4

141

74%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

106
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

93

87%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

136
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

4

3%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

107

75%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

177

87%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

8

3%

LEVEL 3

48

16%

LEVEL 4

243

81%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

22

76%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

42
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

28

56%

LEVEL 4

14

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

219
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

2%

LEVEL 3

29

13%

LEVEL 4

190

85%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

327
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

14

4%

LEVEL 3

75

22%

LEVEL 4

252

73%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

9

90%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

5

83%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

26

81%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

49

83%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

198
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

1%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

173

86%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

274
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

14

5%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

208

71%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

194
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

2%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

170

86%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

35
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

29

81%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.