ACHIEVEMENT FIRST NORTH BROOKLYN PRE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

24

14%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

103

59%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

20

8%

LEVEL 3

74

30%

LEVEL 4

143

58%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

13

15%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

54

62%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

6

5%

LEVEL 3

39

34%

LEVEL 4

69

60%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

11

13%

LEVEL 3

25

29%

LEVEL 4

49

56%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

14

11%

LEVEL 3

35

27%

LEVEL 4

74

57%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

17

37%

LEVEL 4

22

48%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

105
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

13

11%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

77

63%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

171
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

15

8%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

118

61%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

13

9%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

95

65%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

10

5%

LEVEL 3

63

30%

LEVEL 4

132

63%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

8

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

11

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

129
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

19

13%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

93

62%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

200
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

14

6%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

134

61%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

16
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

10

43%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

17
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

9

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

12

60%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

7

30%

LEVEL 4

13

57%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

23

15%

LEVEL 3

36

23%

LEVEL 4

91

59%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

17

8%

LEVEL 3

67

30%

LEVEL 4

130

59%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

137
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

18

11%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

99

62%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.