Skip to Content
Main content

BROOKLYN PROSPECTCS-CSD 13 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

66

20%

LEVEL 3

111

34%

LEVEL 4

126

39%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

353
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

35

8%

LEVEL 2

76

16%

LEVEL 3

155

33%

LEVEL 4

198

43%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

31

19%

LEVEL 3

61

37%

LEVEL 4

56

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

167
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

39

18%

LEVEL 3

74

34%

LEVEL 4

93

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

50

31%

LEVEL 4

70

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

186
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

37

15%

LEVEL 3

81

33%

LEVEL 4

105

43%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

24
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

15

58%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

35
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

14

38%

LEVEL 4

21

57%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

11

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

6

5%

LEVEL 3

48

39%

LEVEL 4

67

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

158
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

7%

LEVEL 3

54

32%

LEVEL 4

104

61%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

59
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

19

16%

LEVEL 2

42

35%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

26

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

91
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

45

28%

LEVEL 3

57

36%

LEVEL 4

34

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

14

34%

LEVEL 4

10

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

46
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

8

11%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

21

30%

LEVEL 4

25

36%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

54

18%

LEVEL 3

102

35%

LEVEL 4

119

41%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

324
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

57

14%

LEVEL 3

132

33%

LEVEL 4

192

48%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

7

20%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

7

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

29
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

19

28%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

23

34%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

352
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

75

16%

LEVEL 3

154

34%

LEVEL 4

198

43%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

178
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

80

37%

LEVEL 4

98

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

263
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

35

12%

LEVEL 3

93

31%

LEVEL 4

170

56%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

16

15%

LEVEL 2

33

31%

LEVEL 3

31

29%

LEVEL 4

28

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

41

26%

LEVEL 3

62

39%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

232
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

62

20%

LEVEL 3

109

34%

LEVEL 4

123

39%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.