Skip to Content
Main content

EAST LOWER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

16
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

182

73%

LEVEL 2

50

20%

LEVEL 3

11

4%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

14
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

188

74%

LEVEL 2

53

21%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

67

65%

LEVEL 2

28

27%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

68

69%

LEVEL 2

25

25%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

8
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

115

79%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

8
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

120

77%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

17

77%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

12

55%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

102

73%

LEVEL 2

28

20%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

102

77%

LEVEL 2

25

19%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

58

75%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

69

74%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

15
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

155

72%

LEVEL 2

46

21%

LEVEL 3

10

5%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

13
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

151

71%

LEVEL 2

48

23%

LEVEL 3

10

5%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

27

84%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

37

86%

LEVEL 2

5

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

146

71%

LEVEL 2

43

21%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

166

74%

LEVEL 2

45

20%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

36

84%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

22

73%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

13

62%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

16

43%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

169

74%

LEVEL 2

43

19%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

172

79%

LEVEL 2

41

19%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

174

73%

LEVEL 2

47

20%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

174

74%

LEVEL 2

48

20%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

14

74%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.