Skip to Content
Main content

COMPARING STAFF EVALUATIONS

Since Education Law §3012-c requires a number of decisions within APPR plans to be collectively bargained, APPR results across school districts and BOCES may not be based on the exact same measures, assessments, or scales for every classroom teacher or building principal. Thus, caution should be exercised when attempting to compare results across school districts and BOCES.

MAHOPAC HIGH SCHOOL

2015

MAHOPAC HIGH SCHOOL

2014

OVERALL COMPOSITE RATING

Each classroom teacher and building principal must receive an overall rating based on a single composite effectiveness score that is calculated based on the scores received by the teacher or principal in each of the three subcomponents. View more detailed information about the Overall Composite Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
0
0%
EFFECTIVE
36
30%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
83
70%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 119
INEFFECTIVE
1
1%
DEVELOPING
1
1%
EFFECTIVE
41
34%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
79
65%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 122

STATE GROWTH OR OTHER COMPARABLE MEASURES RATING

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on State Growth or Other Comparable Measures (State-provided growth scores or Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)). A State Growth or Other Comparable Measure must measure student growth. View more detailed information about the State Growth or Other Comparable Measures Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
0
0%
EFFECTIVE
1
1%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
118
99%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 119
INEFFECTIVE
1
1%
DEVELOPING
9
7%
EFFECTIVE
18
15%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
94
77%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 122

LOCALLY-SELECTED MEASURES

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on Locally-Selected Measures. A Locally-Selected Measure may either measure growth or achievement from a selection of available assessment options. View more detailed information about the Locally-Selected Measures.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
0
0%
EFFECTIVE
32
27%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
87
73%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 119
INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
3
2%
EFFECTIVE
31
25%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
88
72%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 122

OTHER MEASURES OF EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS RATING

Education Law §3012-c requires that 60% of teacher and principal evaluations be based on multiple measures of teacher/principal effectiveness consistent with standards prescribed by the Commissioner in regulation. This will include the extent to which the educator demonstrates proficiency in meeting New York State's teaching or leadership standards. View more detailed information about the Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
0
0%
DEVELOPING
2
2%
EFFECTIVE
63
53%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
54
45%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 119
INEFFECTIVE
1
1%
DEVELOPING
0
0%
EFFECTIVE
30
25%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
91
75%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 122
Top