Skip to Content
Main content

Printed on: December 2, 2024, 3:29 am

NYC GEOG DIST #28 - QUEENS - Educator Evaluation Data

2014-15 Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Ratings (Education Law §3012-c)

Overall Composite Rating Display Last Year's Data

Each classroom teacher and building principal must receive an overall rating based on a single composite effectiveness score that is calculated based on the scores received by the teacher or principal in each of the three subcomponents. View more detailed information about the Overall Composite Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
28
1%
DEVELOPING
116
5%
EFFECTIVE
1,988
84%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
223
9%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 2,355

State Growth or Other Comparable Measures Rating Display Last Year's Data

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on State Growth or Other Comparable Measures (State-provided growth scores or Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)). A State Growth or Other Comparable Measure must measure student growth. View more detailed information about the State Growth or Other Comparable Measures Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
45
2%
DEVELOPING
199
8%
EFFECTIVE
1,959
83%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
152
6%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 2,355

Locally-Selected Measures Rating

Education Law §3012-c requires that 20% of a teacher's or principal's evaluation be based on Locally-Selected Measures. A Locally-Selected Measure may either measure growth or achievement from a selection of available assessment options. View more detailed information about the Locally-Selected Measures.

INEFFECTIVE
32
1%
DEVELOPING
204
9%
EFFECTIVE
1,960
83%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
159
7%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 2,355

Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness Rating

Education Law §3012-c requires that 60% of teacher and principal evaluations be based on multiple measures of teacher/principal effectiveness consistent with standards prescribed by the Commissioner in regulation. This will include the extent to which the educator demonstrates proficiency in meeting New York State's teaching or leadership standards. View more detailed information about the Other Measures of Educator Effectiveness Rating.

INEFFECTIVE
22
1%
DEVELOPING
173
7%
EFFECTIVE
1,182
50%
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE
978
42%
TOTAL EDUCATORS: 2,355

Pursuant to Education Law §3012-c(10), viewers of this site will not be able to find personally identifiable information for any teacher or principal, including an individual educator's evaluation ratings by name anywhere on this website. However, parents or legal guardians may contact their child's district or BOCES to obtain information about their child's teacher(s) or principal(s) composite effectiveness score and/or their final overall rating.

Top