GREENWICH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

90

28%

LEVEL 2

137

43%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

77

25%

LEVEL 2

127

42%

LEVEL 3

77

25%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

35

24%

LEVEL 2

61

41%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

36

23%

LEVEL 2

63

41%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

55

33%

LEVEL 2

76

45%

LEVEL 3

23

14%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

41

28%

LEVEL 2

64

43%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

88

29%

LEVEL 2

132

43%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

74

25%

LEVEL 2

120

41%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

55

21%

LEVEL 2

126

47%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

44

17%

LEVEL 2

119

46%

LEVEL 3

75

29%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

35

70%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

33

77%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

47

21%

LEVEL 2

100

44%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

37

17%

LEVEL 2

94

43%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

43

48%

LEVEL 2

37

42%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

40

48%

LEVEL 2

33

39%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.