Skip to Content
Main content

SCHALMONT MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

129

22%

LEVEL 2

242

40%

LEVEL 3

159

27%

LEVEL 4

69

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

88

29%

LEVEL 2

132

44%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

51

17%

LEVEL 2

115

39%

LEVEL 3

86

29%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

42

29%

LEVEL 2

62

42%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

78

25%

LEVEL 2

127

42%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

46

30%

LEVEL 2

70

45%

LEVEL 3

31

20%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

211
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

113

21%

LEVEL 2

226

41%

LEVEL 3

148

27%

LEVEL 4

63

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

79

29%

LEVEL 2

126

46%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

77

15%

LEVEL 2

227

43%

LEVEL 3

158

30%

LEVEL 4

66

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

58

22%

LEVEL 2

124

47%

LEVEL 3

69

26%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

52

73%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

30

79%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

72

16%

LEVEL 2

185

40%

LEVEL 3

143

31%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

53

24%

LEVEL 2

100

45%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

57

40%

LEVEL 2

57

40%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

35

44%

LEVEL 2

32

40%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.