Skip to Content
Main content

KENT PRIMARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

30

17%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

64

36%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

46

36%

LEVEL 3

56

44%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

11

11%

LEVEL 2

43

45%

LEVEL 3

31

32%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

33

50%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

19

23%

LEVEL 2

26

32%

LEVEL 3

33

41%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

9

15%

LEVEL 2

25

41%

LEVEL 3

23

38%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

20

17%

LEVEL 2

40

33%

LEVEL 3

49

40%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

26

32%

LEVEL 3

41

50%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

20

53%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

15

48%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

63

41%

LEVEL 3

62

40%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

40

36%

LEVEL 3

52

47%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

77
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

27

16%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

63

37%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

21

15%

LEVEL 2

50

36%

LEVEL 3

53

39%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

34

36%

LEVEL 3

45

48%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

19

48%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

8

24%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.