Skip to Content
Main content

BEEKMANTOWN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

156

39%

LEVEL 2

156

39%

LEVEL 3

67

17%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

109

36%

LEVEL 2

117

38%

LEVEL 3

63

21%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

50

27%

LEVEL 2

83

45%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

37

25%

LEVEL 2

59

40%

LEVEL 3

42

28%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

106

50%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

72

46%

LEVEL 2

58

37%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

149

39%

LEVEL 2

152

40%

LEVEL 3

63

16%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

104

36%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

86

27%

LEVEL 2

146

46%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

58

24%

LEVEL 2

108

44%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

70

85%

LEVEL 2

10

12%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

51

85%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

43

24%

LEVEL 2

79

44%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

61

41%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

113

52%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

23

11%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

71

45%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.