Skip to Content
Main content

CATSKILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

172

49%

LEVEL 2

118

33%

LEVEL 3

51

14%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

127

44%

LEVEL 2

107

37%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

69

42%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

49

37%

LEVEL 2

51

39%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

103

55%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

78

49%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

19

12%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

115

46%

LEVEL 2

82

33%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

77

39%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

27

59%

LEVEL 2

16

35%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

22

65%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

21

58%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

18

50%

LEVEL 2

14

39%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

123

42%

LEVEL 2

108

37%

LEVEL 3

50

17%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

81

34%

LEVEL 2

101

42%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

49

82%

LEVEL 2

10

17%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

46

87%

LEVEL 2

6

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

63
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

168

48%

LEVEL 2

117

34%

LEVEL 3

51

15%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

56
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

125

44%

LEVEL 2

103

36%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

69

41%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

37

29%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

103

55%

LEVEL 2

66

35%

LEVEL 3

15

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

90

55%

LEVEL 2

62

38%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.