SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

121

32%

LEVEL 2

166

44%

LEVEL 3

72

19%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

108

26%

LEVEL 2

190

46%

LEVEL 3

84

20%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

44

30%

LEVEL 2

65

45%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

30

18%

LEVEL 2

85

51%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

77

33%

LEVEL 2

101

43%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

78

32%

LEVEL 2

105

43%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

35

34%

LEVEL 2

41

40%

LEVEL 3

21

20%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

27

25%

LEVEL 2

50

46%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

81

31%

LEVEL 2

119

45%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

76

27%

LEVEL 2

133

47%

LEVEL 3

60

21%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

80

25%

LEVEL 2

148

47%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

62

19%

LEVEL 2

162

49%

LEVEL 3

80

24%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

41

65%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

46

58%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

85
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

91

29%

LEVEL 2

142

45%

LEVEL 3

66

21%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

114
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

167

48%

LEVEL 3

84

24%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

30

50%

LEVEL 2

24

40%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

43

65%

LEVEL 2

23

35%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

16

53%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

21

60%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

114

33%

LEVEL 2

150

43%

LEVEL 3

66

19%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

98

26%

LEVEL 2

169

45%

LEVEL 3

82

22%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.