Skip to Content
Main content

A A KINGSTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

69

25%

LEVEL 2

88

31%

LEVEL 3

87

31%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

67

21%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

89

28%

LEVEL 4

60

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

21

16%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

42

33%

LEVEL 4

25

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

19

14%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

45

33%

LEVEL 4

34

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

48

32%

LEVEL 2

47

31%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

48

27%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

65

25%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

76

30%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

132
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

63

22%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

79

28%

LEVEL 4

53

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

6

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

45

18%

LEVEL 2

87

34%

LEVEL 3

84

33%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

88

32%

LEVEL 4

60

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

24

86%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

26

76%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

70

37%

LEVEL 4

34

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

74

36%

LEVEL 4

52

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

46

50%

LEVEL 2

26

28%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

47

43%

LEVEL 2

40

36%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.