HAMBURG MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

70

19%

LEVEL 2

134

36%

LEVEL 3

108

29%

LEVEL 4

60

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

53

18%

LEVEL 2

75

26%

LEVEL 3

95

33%

LEVEL 4

65

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

61

34%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

53

35%

LEVEL 4

39

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

49

26%

LEVEL 2

73

38%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

31

22%

LEVEL 2

39

28%

LEVEL 3

42

30%

LEVEL 4

26

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

68

19%

LEVEL 2

124

35%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

59

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

47

17%

LEVEL 2

71

26%

LEVEL 3

91

33%

LEVEL 4

63

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

123

37%

LEVEL 3

107

32%

LEVEL 4

60

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

71

28%

LEVEL 3

94

37%

LEVEL 4

64

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

27

69%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

26

81%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

106

35%

LEVEL 3

93

31%

LEVEL 4

58

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

37

16%

LEVEL 2

61

26%

LEVEL 3

80

34%

LEVEL 4

60

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

25

36%

LEVEL 2

28

40%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

16

32%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

15

30%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.