Skip to Content
Main content

CAYUGA HTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

57

25%

LEVEL 2

91

40%

LEVEL 3

63

27%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

59

26%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

77

33%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

21

19%

LEVEL 2

45

41%

LEVEL 3

32

29%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

21

18%

LEVEL 2

31

27%

LEVEL 3

49

43%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

36

30%

LEVEL 2

46

38%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

38

33%

LEVEL 2

43

37%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

48

24%

LEVEL 2

84

41%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

90
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

51

25%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

72

35%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

86

43%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

70

35%

LEVEL 3

76

38%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

25

81%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

27

84%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

51

41%

LEVEL 3

41

33%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

18

16%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

40

36%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

39

36%

LEVEL 2

40

37%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

41

34%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

37

31%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.