Skip to Content
Main content

KENNEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

168

45%

LEVEL 2

144

39%

LEVEL 3

54

14%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

163

42%

LEVEL 2

147

38%

LEVEL 3

63

16%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

69

39%

LEVEL 2

77

44%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

70

37%

LEVEL 2

72

38%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

99

50%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

93

47%

LEVEL 2

75

38%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

160

45%

LEVEL 2

136

38%

LEVEL 3

53

15%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

148

42%

LEVEL 2

136

38%

LEVEL 3

60

17%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

121

38%

LEVEL 2

140

43%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

73
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

133

39%

LEVEL 2

136

40%

LEVEL 3

61

18%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

47

92%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

30

70%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

34

30%

LEVEL 2

52

46%

LEVEL 3

23

20%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

36

34%

LEVEL 2

41

39%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

134

52%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

31

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

127

45%

LEVEL 2

106

38%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.