Skip to Content
Main content

PS 114 LUIS LLORENS TORRES SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

163

47%

LEVEL 2

107

31%

LEVEL 3

60

17%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

143

43%

LEVEL 2

107

32%

LEVEL 3

66

20%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

69

40%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

64

40%

LEVEL 2

55

34%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

94

53%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

79

45%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

37

43%

LEVEL 2

27

31%

LEVEL 3

16

19%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

26

32%

LEVEL 2

32

40%

LEVEL 3

17

21%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

115

48%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

40

17%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

108

47%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

111

39%

LEVEL 2

100

35%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

95

34%

LEVEL 2

99

36%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

52

84%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

48

81%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

72
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

73

32%

LEVEL 2

81

36%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

81
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

62

28%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

90

73%

LEVEL 2

26

21%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

81

74%

LEVEL 2

25

23%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

156

47%

LEVEL 2

103

31%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

139

43%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

56
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

95

42%

LEVEL 2

77

34%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

59
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

83

38%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

68

56%

LEVEL 2

30

25%

LEVEL 3

17

14%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

26
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

60

51%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.