Skip to Content
Main content

IS 117 JOSEPH H WADE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

208

47%

LEVEL 2

161

36%

LEVEL 3

61

14%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

235

53%

LEVEL 2

137

31%

LEVEL 3

51

11%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

73

35%

LEVEL 2

93

44%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

76

37%

LEVEL 2

77

38%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

135

57%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

159

65%

LEVEL 2

60

25%

LEVEL 3

16

7%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

42

50%

LEVEL 2

31

37%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

45

54%

LEVEL 2

24

29%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

163

47%

LEVEL 2

125

36%

LEVEL 3

49

14%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

183

52%

LEVEL 2

109

31%

LEVEL 3

41

12%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

133

39%

LEVEL 2

141

42%

LEVEL 3

51

15%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

157

46%

LEVEL 2

115

34%

LEVEL 3

48

14%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

75

71%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

78

75%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

73
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

93

32%

LEVEL 2

121

42%

LEVEL 3

59

21%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

71
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

123

41%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

115

73%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

112

75%

LEVEL 2

33

22%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

200

47%

LEVEL 2

158

37%

LEVEL 3

57

13%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

227

53%

LEVEL 2

130

31%

LEVEL 3

47

11%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

52
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

133

45%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

50
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

156

52%

LEVEL 2

93

31%

LEVEL 3

35

12%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

75

51%

LEVEL 2

50

34%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

25
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

79

53%

LEVEL 2

44

30%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.