JHS 22 JORDAN L MOTT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

169

43%

LEVEL 2

149

38%

LEVEL 3

60

15%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

157

41%

LEVEL 2

151

39%

LEVEL 3

52

14%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

62

35%

LEVEL 2

74

42%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

68

37%

LEVEL 2

72

39%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

107

50%

LEVEL 2

75

35%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

89

44%

LEVEL 2

79

39%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

34

43%

LEVEL 2

33

41%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

37

45%

LEVEL 2

30

36%

LEVEL 3

14

17%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

131

44%

LEVEL 2

108

37%

LEVEL 3

46

16%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

116

40%

LEVEL 2

115

40%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

126

41%

LEVEL 2

113

37%

LEVEL 3

57

18%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

107

35%

LEVEL 2

125

41%

LEVEL 3

49

16%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

43

52%

LEVEL 2

36

43%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

50

62%

LEVEL 2

26

32%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

69
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

69

26%

LEVEL 2

124

47%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

74
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

85

29%

LEVEL 2

133

46%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

100

77%

LEVEL 2

25

19%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

72

77%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

164

43%

LEVEL 2

147

38%

LEVEL 3

58

15%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

155

41%

LEVEL 2

149

40%

LEVEL 3

49

13%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

61
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

134

41%

LEVEL 2

129

40%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

66
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

123

40%

LEVEL 2

116

38%

LEVEL 3

44

14%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

35

51%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

34

43%

LEVEL 2

35

44%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.