Skip to Content
Main content

PS 28 MOUNT HOPE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

121

40%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

57

19%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

111

38%

LEVEL 2

86

30%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

42

32%

LEVEL 2

45

35%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

45

37%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

79

45%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

23

13%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

66

39%

LEVEL 2

54

32%

LEVEL 3

38

22%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

21

32%

LEVEL 2

22

34%

LEVEL 3

13

20%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

98

42%

LEVEL 2

84

36%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

80

37%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

72

32%

LEVEL 2

84

37%

LEVEL 3

55

24%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

57

27%

LEVEL 2

72

33%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

49

63%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

54

71%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

67
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

72

33%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

83
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

63

30%

LEVEL 2

64

30%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

49

58%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

48

59%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

117

40%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

106

38%

LEVEL 2

81

29%

LEVEL 3

75

27%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

55
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

93

40%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

40

17%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

75
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

75

35%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

62

29%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

28

37%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

36

48%

LEVEL 2

20

27%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.