NEW MILLENNIUM BRONX ACAD ARTS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

86

39%

LEVEL 2

93

43%

LEVEL 3

30

14%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

48
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

129

48%

LEVEL 2

94

35%

LEVEL 3

39

14%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

26

27%

LEVEL 2

48

50%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

48

41%

LEVEL 2

50

42%

LEVEL 3

17

14%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

60

49%

LEVEL 2

45

37%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

81

53%

LEVEL 2

44

29%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

40

42%

LEVEL 2

34

36%

LEVEL 3

20

21%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

58

41%

LEVEL 2

62

44%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

86

51%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

53

34%

LEVEL 2

65

42%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

83

41%

LEVEL 2

77

38%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

33

53%

LEVEL 2

28

45%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

46

67%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

38
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

44

28%

LEVEL 2

75

48%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

47
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

76

38%

LEVEL 2

78

39%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

42

69%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

53

76%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

10

37%

LEVEL 2

12

44%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

15

48%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

76

40%

LEVEL 2

81

42%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

114

48%

LEVEL 2

82

34%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

32
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

65

39%

LEVEL 2

68

41%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

39
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

95

46%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

21

40%

LEVEL 2

25

47%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

34

52%

LEVEL 2

22

34%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.