Skip to Content
Main content

HOOSICK FALLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

107

31%

LEVEL 2

149

44%

LEVEL 3

62

18%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

88

26%

LEVEL 2

141

42%

LEVEL 3

74

22%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

57

31%

LEVEL 2

81

44%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

41

23%

LEVEL 2

79

44%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

50

32%

LEVEL 2

68

44%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

47

30%

LEVEL 2

62

40%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

83
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

92

29%

LEVEL 2

145

45%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

74

24%

LEVEL 2

135

43%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

75

26%

LEVEL 2

133

46%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

57

20%

LEVEL 2

127

45%

LEVEL 3

68

24%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

32

63%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

31

60%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

44

23%

LEVEL 2

85

44%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

38

21%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

63

43%

LEVEL 2

64

44%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

50

32%

LEVEL 2

73

47%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.