Skip to Content
Main content

HORNELL JUNIOR-SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

135

43%

LEVEL 2

135

43%

LEVEL 3

34

11%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

28
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

115

46%

LEVEL 2

106

43%

LEVEL 3

23

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

64

43%

LEVEL 2

67

45%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

16
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

58

46%

LEVEL 2

52

41%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

71

44%

LEVEL 2

68

42%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

57

46%

LEVEL 2

54

44%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

39
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

116

41%

LEVEL 2

125

45%

LEVEL 3

32

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

26
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

99

44%

LEVEL 2

99

44%

LEVEL 3

21

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

11

65%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

96

37%

LEVEL 2

124

48%

LEVEL 3

34

13%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

26
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

89

42%

LEVEL 2

95

45%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

39

78%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

26

67%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

34

24%

LEVEL 2

76

54%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

26

29%

LEVEL 2

49

54%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

101

59%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

89

56%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.