TODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

55

17%

LEVEL 3

103

32%

LEVEL 4

157

48%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

45

14%

LEVEL 3

108

34%

LEVEL 4

156

48%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

21

14%

LEVEL 3

55

38%

LEVEL 4

68

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

18

13%

LEVEL 3

52

39%

LEVEL 4

61

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

137
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

34

19%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

89

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

151
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

27

14%

LEVEL 3

56

30%

LEVEL 4

95

51%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

31

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

34

79%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

196
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

85

34%

LEVEL 4

111

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

198
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

37

15%

LEVEL 3

90

37%

LEVEL 4

108

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

12

63%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

11

42%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

42

14%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

155

52%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

42

14%

LEVEL 3

102

33%

LEVEL 4

155

50%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

9

31%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

261
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

44

14%

LEVEL 3

108

34%

LEVEL 4

153

48%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.