SEELY PLACE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

62

20%

LEVEL 3

99

32%

LEVEL 4

129

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

49

16%

LEVEL 3

102

34%

LEVEL 4

130

44%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

52

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

28

20%

LEVEL 3

44

31%

LEVEL 4

59

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

22

14%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

77

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

21

13%

LEVEL 3

58

37%

LEVEL 4

71

45%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

10

48%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

78
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

28

31%

LEVEL 4

50

56%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

84
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

32

35%

LEVEL 4

52

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

39

22%

LEVEL 3

59

34%

LEVEL 4

66

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

30

18%

LEVEL 3

59

36%

LEVEL 4

64

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

8

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

127

44%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

43

16%

LEVEL 3

98

35%

LEVEL 4

127

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

227
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

60

20%

LEVEL 3

99

33%

LEVEL 4

128

43%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

228
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

48

16%

LEVEL 3

102

35%

LEVEL 4

126

43%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

80%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.