Skip to Content
Main content

FONDA-FULTONVILLE 5-8 SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

105

24%

LEVEL 2

196

45%

LEVEL 3

109

25%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

37

16%

LEVEL 2

88

38%

LEVEL 3

73

31%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

52

24%

LEVEL 2

106

49%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

46

41%

LEVEL 3

31

28%

LEVEL 4

19

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

53

24%

LEVEL 2

90

41%

LEVEL 3

60

28%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

21

17%

LEVEL 2

42

34%

LEVEL 3

42

34%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

98

24%

LEVEL 2

186

45%

LEVEL 3

107

26%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

69

31%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

73

19%

LEVEL 2

171

45%

LEVEL 3

107

28%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

78

38%

LEVEL 3

72

35%

LEVEL 4

36

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

32

54%

LEVEL 2

25

42%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

16

59%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

103

42%

LEVEL 3

79

32%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

50

33%

LEVEL 3

57

38%

LEVEL 4

29

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

61

32%

LEVEL 2

93

49%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

22

27%

LEVEL 2

38

46%

LEVEL 3

16

19%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.