Skip to Content
Main content

STEWART SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

15

5%

LEVEL 2

48

17%

LEVEL 3

105

36%

LEVEL 4

120

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

48

16%

LEVEL 3

105

35%

LEVEL 4

133

45%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

22

15%

LEVEL 3

53

37%

LEVEL 4

57

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

28

20%

LEVEL 3

56

39%

LEVEL 4

52

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

26

18%

LEVEL 3

52

36%

LEVEL 4

63

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

20

13%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

81

53%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

13

65%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

16

94%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

193
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

42

17%

LEVEL 3

91

37%

LEVEL 4

102

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

209
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

43

16%

LEVEL 3

100

38%

LEVEL 4

109

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

43

16%

LEVEL 3

101

38%

LEVEL 4

116

44%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

39

15%

LEVEL 3

97

36%

LEVEL 4

127

48%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

11

46%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

235
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

46

16%

LEVEL 3

103

35%

LEVEL 4

132

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.