Skip to Content
Main content

MORIAH CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

82

27%

LEVEL 2

131

43%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

77

26%

LEVEL 2

117

39%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

36

24%

LEVEL 2

74

50%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

39

27%

LEVEL 2

56

39%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

46

29%

LEVEL 2

57

36%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

38

25%

LEVEL 2

61

40%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

78

26%

LEVEL 2

127

43%

LEVEL 3

58

20%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

33

14%

LEVEL 2

114

49%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

100

46%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

40

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

49

67%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

54

68%

LEVEL 2

17

21%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

22

16%

LEVEL 2

63

47%

LEVEL 3

30

22%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

50

39%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

34

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

60

35%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

67

39%

LEVEL 2

67

39%

LEVEL 3

28

16%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.