Skip to Content
Main content

URBAN SCIENCE ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

237

75%

LEVEL 2

70

22%

LEVEL 3

10

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

179

66%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

7

3%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

117

79%

LEVEL 2

27

18%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

72

62%

LEVEL 2

39

34%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

120

71%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

107

69%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

52

58%

LEVEL 2

33

37%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

53

69%

LEVEL 2

23

30%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

180

82%

LEVEL 2

36

16%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

121

65%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

193

74%

LEVEL 2

59

23%

LEVEL 3

9

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

134

62%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

7

3%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

44

79%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

45

80%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

125

64%

LEVEL 2

62

32%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

105

61%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

112

93%

LEVEL 2

8

7%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

74

74%

LEVEL 2

26

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

55

87%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

44

70%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

182

72%

LEVEL 2

63

25%

LEVEL 3

9

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

135

65%

LEVEL 2

67

32%

LEVEL 3

5

2%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.