Skip to Content
Main content

PENN YAN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

113

29%

LEVEL 2

142

37%

LEVEL 3

83

21%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

91

23%

LEVEL 2

137

35%

LEVEL 3

111

28%

LEVEL 4

55

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

56

28%

LEVEL 2

78

40%

LEVEL 3

40

20%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

48

24%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

57

30%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

43

22%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

98

28%

LEVEL 2

129

37%

LEVEL 3

77

22%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

151
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

84

24%

LEVEL 2

121

34%

LEVEL 3

100

28%

LEVEL 4

51

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

58

18%

LEVEL 2

127

40%

LEVEL 3

79

25%

LEVEL 4

51

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

52

15%

LEVEL 2

126

37%

LEVEL 3

108

32%

LEVEL 4

55

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

55

74%

LEVEL 2

15

20%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

39

74%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

32

18%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

32

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

52

30%

LEVEL 3

62

35%

LEVEL 4

38

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

81

38%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

68

31%

LEVEL 2

85

39%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.