Skip to Content
Main content

IS 313 SCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP DEV GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

185

63%

LEVEL 2

76

26%

LEVEL 3

25

9%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

136

50%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

82

59%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

60

49%

LEVEL 2

34

28%

LEVEL 3

22

18%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

103

67%

LEVEL 2

38

25%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

76

52%

LEVEL 2

43

29%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

50

56%

LEVEL 2

31

35%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

30

43%

LEVEL 2

25

36%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

130

65%

LEVEL 2

45

23%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

101

52%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

141

58%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

25

10%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

94

43%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

44

86%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

42

82%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

27
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

101

53%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

61

38%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

84

82%

LEVEL 2

13

13%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

75

68%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

19

68%

LEVEL 2

5

18%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

11

39%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

166

62%

LEVEL 2

71

27%

LEVEL 3

23

9%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

125

52%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

27
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

143

61%

LEVEL 2

64

27%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

50
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

107

50%

LEVEL 2

59

27%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

42

70%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

29

54%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.