Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 218 R H DUAL LANG MAGNET GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

212

40%

LEVEL 2

150

28%

LEVEL 3

111

21%

LEVEL 4

54

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

235
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

230

35%

LEVEL 2

190

29%

LEVEL 3

142

22%

LEVEL 4

93

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

101

38%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

102

32%

LEVEL 2

91

29%

LEVEL 3

76

24%

LEVEL 4

50

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

111

43%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

128

38%

LEVEL 2

99

29%

LEVEL 3

66

20%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

9

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

147
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

199

41%

LEVEL 2

138

29%

LEVEL 3

101

21%

LEVEL 4

46

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

212
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 610

LEVEL 1

219

36%

LEVEL 2

179

29%

LEVEL 3

130

21%

LEVEL 4

82

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

138

32%

LEVEL 2

133

31%

LEVEL 3

107

25%

LEVEL 4

51

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

143

27%

LEVEL 2

167

31%

LEVEL 3

133

25%

LEVEL 4

90

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

74

76%

LEVEL 2

17

17%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

87

71%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

154
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

110

29%

LEVEL 2

119

31%

LEVEL 3

101

26%

LEVEL 4

53

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

220
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

115

23%

LEVEL 2

155

32%

LEVEL 3

129

26%

LEVEL 4

91

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

102

71%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

10

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

115

70%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

24

39%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

12

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

31

35%

LEVEL 2

24

27%

LEVEL 3

20

23%

LEVEL 4

13

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

188

40%

LEVEL 2

135

29%

LEVEL 3

101

22%

LEVEL 4

42

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

202
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

199

35%

LEVEL 2

166

29%

LEVEL 3

122

22%

LEVEL 4

80

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

146
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

176

39%

LEVEL 2

130

29%

LEVEL 3

96

21%

LEVEL 4

50

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

208
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

188

34%

LEVEL 2

159

29%

LEVEL 3

126

23%

LEVEL 4

82

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

36

48%

LEVEL 2

20

27%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

27
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

42

42%

LEVEL 2

31

31%

LEVEL 3

16

16%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.