Skip to Content
Main content

IS 232 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

243

53%

LEVEL 2

140

31%

LEVEL 3

55

12%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

264

55%

LEVEL 2

128

27%

LEVEL 3

57

12%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

114

50%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

133

57%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

24

10%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

129

56%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

19

8%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

131

54%

LEVEL 2

70

29%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

46

53%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

58
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

193

53%

LEVEL 2

114

31%

LEVEL 3

44

12%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

202

54%

LEVEL 2

102

27%

LEVEL 3

46

12%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

171

47%

LEVEL 2

126

34%

LEVEL 3

52

14%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

191

50%

LEVEL 2

113

29%

LEVEL 3

53

14%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

72

80%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

73

78%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

116

43%

LEVEL 2

98

36%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

71
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

142

47%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

127

69%

LEVEL 2

42

23%

LEVEL 3

13

7%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

122

70%

LEVEL 2

39

22%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

241

54%

LEVEL 2

136

30%

LEVEL 3

54

12%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

258

55%

LEVEL 2

125

27%

LEVEL 3

56

12%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

60
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

196

54%

LEVEL 2

107

29%

LEVEL 3

46

13%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

76
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

212

54%

LEVEL 2

104

27%

LEVEL 3

52

13%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

47

50%

LEVEL 2

33

35%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

52

61%

LEVEL 2

24

28%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.