Skip to Content
Main content

PS 70 MAX SCHOENFELD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 610

LEVEL 1

312

51%

LEVEL 2

153

25%

LEVEL 3

112

18%

LEVEL 4

33

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

252

46%

LEVEL 2

123

22%

LEVEL 3

111

20%

LEVEL 4

61

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

138

48%

LEVEL 2

80

28%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

113

43%

LEVEL 2

58

22%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

174

54%

LEVEL 2

73

23%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

139

49%

LEVEL 2

65

23%

LEVEL 3

51

18%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

82

61%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

33
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

62

52%

LEVEL 2

24

20%

LEVEL 3

22

18%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

122
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

222

48%

LEVEL 2

120

26%

LEVEL 3

95

20%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

137
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

186

44%

LEVEL 2

98

23%

LEVEL 3

87

21%

LEVEL 4

50

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

232

47%

LEVEL 2

126

25%

LEVEL 3

106

21%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

183

42%

LEVEL 2

103

23%

LEVEL 3

96

22%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

80

70%

LEVEL 2

27

23%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

69

64%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

111
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

187

45%

LEVEL 2

119

29%

LEVEL 3

86

21%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

145
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

143

38%

LEVEL 2

89

24%

LEVEL 3

93

25%

LEVEL 4

52

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

34
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

125

65%

LEVEL 2

34

18%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

27
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

109

64%

LEVEL 2

34

20%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 590

LEVEL 1

303

51%

LEVEL 2

147

25%

LEVEL 3

109

18%

LEVEL 4

31

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

246

47%

LEVEL 2

119

22%

LEVEL 3

106

20%

LEVEL 4

58

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

112
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

224

49%

LEVEL 2

118

26%

LEVEL 3

84

19%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

150
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

197

44%

LEVEL 2

102

23%

LEVEL 3

96

21%

LEVEL 4

54

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

33
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

88

56%

LEVEL 2

35

22%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

55

56%

LEVEL 2

21

21%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.