JHS 22 JORDAN L MOTT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

252

61%

LEVEL 2

112

27%

LEVEL 3

41

10%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

225

57%

LEVEL 2

125

31%

LEVEL 3

38

10%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

116

62%

LEVEL 2

44

24%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

107

56%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

136

60%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

118

57%

LEVEL 2

73

35%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

48

60%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

42

51%

LEVEL 2

28

34%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

197

62%

LEVEL 2

86

27%

LEVEL 3

28

9%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

175

58%

LEVEL 2

95

31%

LEVEL 3

27

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

44
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

197

60%

LEVEL 2

90

27%

LEVEL 3

36

11%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

169

53%

LEVEL 2

109

34%

LEVEL 3

33

10%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

55

66%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

56

73%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

46
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

126

48%

LEVEL 2

91

35%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

45
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

137

48%

LEVEL 2

104

36%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

126

83%

LEVEL 2

21

14%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

88

79%

LEVEL 2

21

19%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

11

73%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

241

60%

LEVEL 2

110

28%

LEVEL 3

39

10%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

219

57%

LEVEL 2

121

31%

LEVEL 3

37

10%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

45
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

208

60%

LEVEL 2

93

27%

LEVEL 3

36

10%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

39
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

171

54%

LEVEL 2

108

34%

LEVEL 3

31

10%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

44

65%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

54

68%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.