KAPPA GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

124

44%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

105

35%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

68

46%

LEVEL 2

48

32%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

56

35%

LEVEL 2

46

29%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

30

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

56

41%

LEVEL 2

48

35%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

49

36%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

70

50%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

12

9%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

48
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

58

39%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

43

36%

LEVEL 2

43

36%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

42

32%

LEVEL 2

39

30%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

80

35%

LEVEL 2

86

38%

LEVEL 3

34

15%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

58

25%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

60

25%

LEVEL 4

46

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

44

77%

LEVEL 2

10

18%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

47

76%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

63
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

91

37%

LEVEL 2

89

37%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

107
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

80

30%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

47

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

33

79%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

25

78%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

8

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

117

44%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

32

12%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

95

36%

LEVEL 2

75

29%

LEVEL 3

54

21%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

50
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

102

43%

LEVEL 2

83

35%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

100
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

98

36%

LEVEL 2

75

27%

LEVEL 3

55

20%

LEVEL 4

45

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

22

44%

LEVEL 2

13

26%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.